Chapter/Index: Introduction | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Appendix
The intensity of the core-loss signal as a function of scattering angle θ and energy loss E in Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) is described by the differential cross-section:
where, The differential cross-section in Formula 3a depends on several factors including the material properties, the electron energy, and the nature of the inelastic scattering event. The differential cross-section for inelastic scattering can be expressed as:
where, In Equation 3b, the Γk/ω term represents the probability of the specific inelastic transition. phasizes that lower energy losses are more probable, resulting in higher intensities at small ΔE (see Figure 3a). The S(q,ω) is a complex function that depends on the material's electronic structure and describes how the material responds to the inelastic scattering event. It is related to the density of states and the nature of the excitations (e.g., plasmons, interband transitions, etc.). is related to the cross-section for the inelastic process and ω\omega is the energy loss (related to the frequency of the energy loss). The term cos2θ/(ΔE)2 captures the angular dependence of the scattered intensity. cos2θ arises from the dipole approximation, which assumes that the inelastic scattering event is dipolar (as in many electron transitions). The (ΔE)2 in the denominator emIn solid angle, the differential cross-section for inelastic scattering of electrons in Formula 3a becomes:
where, The inelastic scattering process often involves transitions in the target material, such as electronic transitions, where an electron excites atoms within the sample. In the dipole approximation, the interaction between the incident electrons and the sample is assumed to be dominated by dipole transitions (electric dipoles), which is valid when the momentum transfer is small (i.e., small angles and energy losses). Under this approximation, the double differential cross-section becomes:
Then, Equation 3b becomes:
In EELS, especially when using a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM), the scattering angles are typically small (i.e., is small). Under this condition, the cosine term can be approximated as:
Therefore, in TEM at small-angle scattering.The dipole approximation assumes that the inelastic scattering process is dominated by dipole transitions, which are common in core-loss events. Under this approximation, the scattering cross-section is strongly peaked at small angles, which simplifies the angular dependence of the cross-section to a form that depends only on the angle and the characteristic angle .The characteristic scattering angle
The differential cross-section is then expressed as:
where, Combining the above elements, we obtain the Bethe Ridge formula for the differential cross-section:
The scattering intensity decreases with increasing energy loss E=ΔE, and the intensity is peaked at small scattering angles θ, with the characteristic angle θE determining the width of this peak. When is much smaller than θE, the term approaches 1, meaning that the intensity remains high. As increases and becomes comparable to or larger than θE, the intensity falls off, reflecting the reduced probability of large-angle scattering.Figure 3a shows the scattering intensity versus energy loss for different scattering angles based on Equation 3cc (Fundametal) and Equation 3f (Bethe Ridge).
Figure 3b shows the scattering intensity versus scattering angle for different energy losses based on Equation 3cc (Fundametal) and Equation 3f (Bethe Ridge).
The characteristic angle θE in the Bethe Ridge formula is a key parameter that defines the angular distribution of the scattered electrons, which is given by:
Figure 3c shows the characteristic angles versus energy loss at different incident electron energies.
|