=================================================================================
The EELS of the lowenergy loss region less than 50 eV is particularly called valence electron energy loss spectroscopy (VEELS) and mainly reflects the excitation of valence band electrons, such as interband transition (single excitation) and plasmon excitation (collective excitation). VEELS can be applied to analyze, for instance, local electronic and optical properties of materials [7] in nanoscale with STEM [8–13]. The STEMVEELS method provides various advantages over conventional optical spectroscopy, for instance, it can measure a wider energy (wavelength) range and local electronic and optical properties from a small volume in a nanoregion. The difficulty of STEMVEELS application is that it is hard to fit a zeroloss tail, to extract ELF (energy loss function) attributable to the large zeroloss tail and to interpret the collective excitation such as plasmon, etc. It was suggested [19] that the probabilities of the ELF
for surface and bulk plasmons are given by Im[−1/(ε + 1)]
and Im[−1/(ε)], respectively.
The dielectric function describes the response of the material to a timedependent electromagnetic field. Since the single and collective excitations induced by the interaction of incident electrons with materials are related to the real (ε_{1}) and imaginary (ε_{2}) parts of the dielectric function ε(ω) in different ways [15], the ε(ω) is used to describe and distinguish the single and collective excitations [1]. If the material is anisotropic, the microscopic dielectric function can be a tensor ε_{αβ}, given by, [6]
 [4360a]
where,
i_{k}> and f_{k}>  The initial and final electron states,
respectively, with energies E_{ik} and E_{fk};
p^{i}  The components of the momentum operator, p = − iħ∇ and ω = E/ħ.
The energies of collective oscillations can be extracted from the dielectric function by calculating the energy loss functions for the surface and bulk solid, which are given by Im(1/ε) and Im[1/(1+ε)], respectively. According to Drude model [2,3], the energy loss function for a bulk plasmon can be given by,
 [4360b]
where,
ω_{p}  Bulk plasmon frequency for collective excitation of free electrons;
τ  Constant
related to the life time of the excitation. ε_{1}  The real part
of the dielectric function;
ε_{2}  The imaginary part
of the dielectric function.
That means the transfer of the energy E (or momentum q) of the incident electrons to the solid electrons is related to the complex dielectric function of the solid ε = ε_{1} + iε_{2} through its imaginary part Im[−1/ε], while the intensity damping, due to the propagation in the dielectric medium, is proportional to ε_{2}. Figure 4360a presents the ELF and ε_{1} and ε_{2} as a function of energy loss. The arrows show
the plasmon peaks and the corresponding ε_{1} around their values close to 0. The three plasmon peaks are at around 12 eV, 18 eV, and 24 eV.
Figure 4360a. The ELF and ε_{1} and ε_{2} as a function of energy loss. [14]
The energy loss function is the relationship between the dielectric response of electrons and the EELS spectrum. Therefore, the EEL spectrum can be described in a dielectric formulation [5] by,
 [4360c]
where,
v  The speed of the incident electron.
n_{a}  The number
of atoms per unit volume.
ε(q, E)  The complex dielectric function at
energy loss E and momentum transfer q.
a_{0}  The Bohr radius.
m_{0}  The electron rest mass.
θ_{E}  The characteristic scattering angle (θ_{E} = E/γm_{0}v^{2}).
An optical absorption method can directly provide the imaginary part of the dielectric function, ε_{2}, associated with a single electron excitation of an interband transition, while EELS cannot directly give ε_{2}. Based on Equation 4360c and a Kramers–Kronig analysis, the complex dielectric function ε = ε_{1} + iε_{2} can still be obtained from the lowloss EEL spectrum.The plasmon signal in EELS can be applied to extract dielectric function [4], valence electron densities, and, in some cases, the phases presented in alloys. Therefore, because of the relationship indicated in Equation 4360b, the real (ε_{1}) and the imaginary (ε_{2}) parts of the dielectric function can be extracted by a KramersKronig analysis.
The experimental single scattering distribution S(E) can be given by, [2, 1618]
 [4360d]
where,
I_{0}  The zero loss
intensity.
t  The specimen thickness.
β  The collection
semiangle.
In both Equations 4360c and 4360d, for small q, ε(q,E) varies very slowly with q and thus it can be replaced by ε(E).
Figure 4360b shows the EEL spectra of plasmon region (zeropeak is not shown) for crystalline and amorphous diamond. The loss function (Im[l/ε]) can then be obtained by removing contribution from multiple scattering using the Fourierlog deconvolution method.
Figure 4360b. EEL spectra of plasmon region for (a) crystalline and (b) amorphous diamond.
Based on the obtained loss function, the real part (ε_{1}), and the imaginary part (ε_{2}) of the dielectric function for the crystalline and the amorphous diamond are extracted using KramersKronig analysis as shown in Figure 4360c. Table 4360 lists the onset energy (indicating the band gap energy) and the peaks in the imaginary spectrum obtained from Figure 4360c and the original interband transitions. In many cases, the broad maxima in ε_{2}, e.g. with energies higher than 10 eV, represent widely distributed oscillator strengths. That is, the peaks in ε_{2} correspond to some interband transitions. The real part ε_{1} of the dielectric function decreases to ~0, indicating a resonance [20]. The resonance in insulators depends on the collective oscillation of the electrons in the valence band. In metals, the resonance depends on the collective oscillations of the free electron gas near the Fermi surface excited by the longrange Coulomb interactions. Furthermore, the resonance of free electron gas in metals is much stronger than that of bound electrons in the valence band of insulators [21].
Figure 4360c. Real part (ε_{1}), and the imaginary part (ε_{2}) of the dielectric function for (a) crystalline and (b) amorphous diamond.
Table 4360. Onset energies (band gap energies), peaks in the imaginary spectrum in Figure 4360c and the original interband transitions.

Onset energy (band gap energy) 
Peaks in imaginary spectrum 
Interband transition 
Crystal diamond 
5.5 eV 
8.2 
Γ point 
12.7 
X and L points 
Amorphous diamond 
4.0 eV 
7.2 eV 
Γ point 
As discussed above, the energy loss spectrum cannot be directly associated with interband transitions because its peak positions at low energy losses are strongly affected by the volume plasmon and the positions of other excitations. The imaginary part of the dielectric function, however, can be associated with interband transitions. The common procedure of obtaining the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function is summarized below:
i) Acquire spectra with a PEELS spectrometer.
ii) FourierLog can be used to deconvolute the spectra to have single scattering distributions S(E).
iii) The spectra are normalized to obtain the energy loss function Im[l/ε].
iv) Remove surface loss effects with KramersKronig Analysis.
v) Obtain the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function with KramersKronig Analysis.
Note that if the EELS energy resolution is poor, then the data at low energy range will be not reliable, for instance, the data below 3 eV are not reliable with an common energy resolution of 1.3 eV.
If the SSD (singlescatter distribution) is known then optical
techniques such as Kramers–Kronig analysis can be
applied to determine the dielectric function, reflectivity, absorption, etc. [7]
[1] Ritchie R.H. and Howie A., Phil. Mag. 36 (1977) 463.
[2] 17. H. Raether, Excitation of Plasmons and Interband Transitions
by Electrons. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol 88,
(SpringerVerlag, New York, 1980).
[3] Pines D., Rev. Mod. Phys. 28 (1956) 184.
[4] Buechner, U. The dielectric function of mica and quartz determined by electron energy losses, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics,
8, (1975) 27812787.
[5] R. F. Egerton, Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope, Plenum Press, New York, 1996.
[6] C. AmbroschDraxl, J.A. Majewski, P. Vogl, G. Leising, Phys. Rev.
B 51 (1995) 9668.
[7] R. F. Egerton, Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope
(Plenum, New York, 1996).
[8] N. Ikarashi, K. Manabe, J. Appl. Phys. 94 (2003) 480–486.
[9] N. Ikarashi, K. Manabe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80 (2002) 4127–4129.
[10] N. Ikarashi, M. Murata, K. Masuzaki, T. Tastumi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84 (2002)
3672–3674.
[11] D.W. McComb, Phys. Rev. B 54 (1996) 7094–7102.
[12] L. Ryen, X.Wang, U. Helmersson, E. Olsson, J. Appl. Phys. 85 (1999) 2828–2834.
[13] P.E. Batson, K.L. Kavanagh, J.M. Woodall, J.W. Mayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986)
2729–2732.
[14] Takanori Kiguchi, NaokiWakiya, Kazuo Shinozaki, Toyohiko J. Konno, ValenceEELS analysis of local electronic and optical properties of PMN–PT
epitaxial film, Materials Science and Engineering B 161 (2009) 160–165.
[15]
I. I. Mazin,Y. G. Maksimov, S. N. Rashkeyev, Y. A. Uspenskiy, in: A. I. Golovashkin (Ed.), Metal Optics and Superconductivity, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 1989, pp. 1–106.
[16] R.H. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. 106 (1957) 874.
[17] J. Daniels, C.V. Festenberg, H. Raether, and K. Zeppenfeld.
Optical Constants of Solids by Electron Spectroscopy. Springer
Tracts in Modern Physics, Vol. 54 (Springer Verlag, New York,
1970) p. 78.
[18] K. Iizumi, K. Saiki, A. Koma, and N.S. Sokolov, J. Electron
Spectrosc. and Relat. Phenom. 88 (1998) 457.
[19] Tan G L, DeNoyer L K, French R H, Guittet M J and
Soyer M G 2005 J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.
142 97.
[20] Bekhti W and Ghamnia M 2004 Catal. Today 89 303.
[21] Tan G L, DeNoyer L K, French R H, Guittet M J and
Soyer M G 2005 J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.
142 97.
