Electron microscopy
Standard Hold-out Validation
- Python Automation and Machine Learning for ICs -
- An Online Book -
Python Automation and Machine Learning for ICs                                                           http://www.globalsino.com/ICs/        

Chapter/Index: Introduction | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Appendix


In standard hold-out validation, we split the dataset into two parts: a training set and a test set. The training set is used to train the model, and the test set is used to evaluate its performance. The primary purpose of this approach is to estimate how well the model will generalize to unseen data.

Table 3788. Advantages and disadvantages of standard hold-out validation.

Advantages Disadvantages
Simplicity: It is easy to understand and implement. You only need to split the dataset into two parts, making it a straightforward method for assessing a model's performance.
Efficiency: Standard hold-out validation is computationally efficient, especially when dealing with large datasets. It requires fewer computations than some other cross-validation techniques.
Speed: Training and evaluating a model using a hold-out validation set is quicker than some more complex cross-validation methods, making it practical for rapid model prototyping and development.
Useful for Large Datasets: It is well-suited for cases where you have a large amount of data, and the performance of the model on the hold-out set can provide a reasonable estimate of generalization performance.
Variance: The performance estimate from a single train/test split can be highly variable. Depending on the random split, you might get different results, which may not be representative of the model's true generalization performance.
Bias: The performance estimate can be biased, especially when the dataset is imbalanced. A random split may lead to an unrepresentative distribution of classes in the training and test sets.
Limited Information: You are using only a portion of your data for testing, which means you might not be fully utilizing the information available in the dataset to assess your model's performance.
Overfitting Risk: There is a risk of overfitting to the specific hold-out set, as the model might perform well on that particular data but poorly on unseen data.
Unreliable for Small Datasets: In cases where you have a small dataset, the standard hold-out method might not provide a robust estimate of the model's performance, and you might be better off using more sophisticated cross-validation techniques.