Patterns on Wafers Commonly Reflecting Specific Process Failure Information
- Python Automation and Machine Learning for ICs - - An Online Book - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Python Automation and Machine Learning for ICs http://www.globalsino.com/ICs/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chapter/Index: Introduction | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Appendix | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
================================================================================= Manual inking, a popular screening technique based on the observation that manufacturing defects are spatially correlated on the wafer surface [2], is being used to filter out the devices that are likely to exhibit latent defects. In this method, the assumption behind this common practice is that clusters of failing die on a wafer suggest a systematic local discrepancy. This technique is based on the proximity of each die to neighboring failed die, and the types of failure in that cluster. On the other hand, manual inking is inconsistently performed between different engineers, and often with slight discrepancies between inspections by the same engineer. Table 4220. Patterns on wafers commonly reflecting specific process failure information.
============================================
[1] Qiao Xu, Naigong Yu and Firdaous Essaf, Improved Wafer Map Inspection Using Attention Mechanism and Cosine Normalization, Machines, https://doi.org/10.3390/machines10020146, 10, 146, 2022.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
================================================================================= | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||