Fab Flow and Properties (e.g. Leakage Current) of Shallow Trench Isolation (STI)
- Practical Electron Microscopy and Database -
- An Online Book -
| Integrated Circuits and Materials http://www.globalsino.com/ICsAndMaterials/ |
Chapter/Index: Introduction | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Appendix
=================================================================================
| The critical applications of plasma etching technologies are: [12] i) Form precisely controlled profiles of high-aspect-ratio contacts (HARC). ii) Form gate stacks. iii) Form shallow trench isolation (STI) in the front end of line (FEOL). iv) Form precise via holes and trenches used in reliable Cu/low-k (low-dielectric-constant material) interconnects in the back end of line (BEOL). |
Table 4834a. Fab flow and properties (e.g. leakage current) of shallow trench isolation (STI). The starred and bold-items are the key development of specific process.
| Process | Hardmask | Critical problems | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flow | Substrate | Pad oxidationa | Other layer b | Resist mask with active layer/dummy | STI photod | SiN etchinge | Pad oxide etchingf | Resist removalh | Si trench etchingg | Undercut of pad oxidei | Linear oxidationj | SiN recess | Gap fill with oxide depk | Densification of trench oxideo | Photomask open in wide active area | SiO2 etching | Resist removal | CMP planarizationc | Pad nitride stripl | Well implantm | Pad oxide strip | Sacrificial oxidationn | Multigate oxidation HF | Gate electrode formation | Reference | |
| Conventional STI | p Si with a resistivity 5~10 Ωcm | 11 nm in a dry O2 ambient at 950 °C | Pad nitride = 190 nm at 785 °C | Yes | Yes | Yes | STI depth = 300nm with Cl2 + O2 | 15 nm | 500 nm TEOS | Annealed in a N2 ambient for 1 hour because the pad-oxide striper (HF) can etch TEOS excessively |
Yes | H3PO4, 160 °C, and 1 hr |
Yes | [10] | ||||||||||||
| DRAM | Buffer oxide | PolySi | [11] | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| DRAM | p Si | 15 nm | Pad nitride = 200 nm | Yes* | Dry etching | Yes | 400 nm | 20 nm gate-oxide in 1000 °C HCl+O2 arnbient | By hot phosphoric acid for embedded logic process (to avoid dip)* |
600 nm HDP CVD to fill the gap, and densified at 1000 °C for 30 min in N2 anrbient. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Dry-etch-assisted CMP under high selectivity (SiO2/SiN) |
Yes | 20 nm after HF: 15 nm | 22nm@ DRAM; 28nm @Logic | Yes | [1] | |||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a. Pad oxidation is used to prevent stresses by pad nitride. If pad nitride is deposited directly on bare silicon, then nitride stress can cause defect in silicon substrate. The pad oxide layer has relatively lower stress than LOCOS, lower thickness than LOCOS. |
Table 4834b. xx.
For STI, the critical issue in the case of the DRAM embedded logic
process is that a higher step height at STI occurs between the
DRAM and logic regions due to the difference in the CMP rate between SiO2 and SiN, which
arises from the difference in the active area (AA) density. On the other hand, it is
necessary to ensure against silicon erosion and polysilicon residue
by gate electrode formation. In particular, a dual work function gate
is indispensable for high-performance logic, it is difficult to form
Figure 4834a. SEM cross-sectional view: (a) conventional STI, and (b) proposed STI which SiN lateral etch = 54 nm. [9]
Figure 4834b. Process flow of the conventional STI process. [10]
Figure 4834c. (a) Pad oxide undercut and (b) Liner oxidation.
|
| [1] T. Yamazaki, K. Ohno, N. Tsuchiya and T. Gocho, Optimized Shallow Trench .Isolation Technology for DRAM Embedded Logic process, 1999 Intcrnstional conf.rmce on solial state Devices a l Metelials, Tokyo, pp. l8-19, (1999). [2] Andres Bryant et.al., IEEE Electron Dev.(l993) p.412. [3] A.H.Perera elal., IEDM (1995) p. 679. [4] T.lshijima et al., IEDM (I 990) p. 257. [5] PieneC. Fazanetal., IEDM (1993) p. 57. [6] W.K.Yeh etal., SSDM (1998) p. 98. [7] A.Chatterjee et al., IEDM, (1996) p. 826. [8] T. Parftetal., IEDM, (1994), p.67 [9] T. Yamazaki, K. Ohno, N. Tsuchiya and T. Gocho, Optimized Shallow Trench .Isolation Technology for DRAM Embedded Logic process, 1999 Intcrnstional conf.rmce on solial state Devices a l Metelials, Tokyo, pp. l8-19, (1999). [10] In Man Kang, Hyuck In Kwon, Myung Won Lee, Byung-Gook Park, Jong Duk Lee, Sang Sik Park, Jung Chak Ahn and Yong Hee Lee, Characteristics of Conventional STI Process-Related Deep-Level Traps in Silicon, Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 44(1), pp. 69∼72, 2004. [11] Kim, J.Y., et al., “The Breakthrough in data retention time of DRAM using Recess-Channel-Array_Transistor (RCAT) for 88nm feature size and beyond”, 2003. [12] Haruhiko ABE, Masahiro YONEDA, and Nobuo FUJIWARA, Developments of Plasma Etching Technology for Fabricating Semiconductor Devices, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1435–1455. |
=================================================================================