================================================================================= 
             Figure 3985a shows the  schematic illustration of the broadening of electron beam within a thin specimen  and of generations of EDS, EELS and AES signals. This beam broadening affects the  spatial resolution of EDS significantly, but does not affect those of EELS and  AES too much. d, R and Rmax are the spot size , the average diameter, and the  maximum diameter of the electron beam within the specimen, respecitively. α  and β  are convergence  semiangle of the electron beam and the  collection semiangle of EELS/EFTEM. The angle-limiting aperture can  be the objective aperture of TEM/STEM system or the entrance aperture of the EELS system, which  is smaller and dominates the beam intensity arriving at the camera. That is, the TEM specimen for EELS measurement  is very thin and not all of these broadened electrons can enter an EELS spectrometer so  that Equation 4626 might overestimate beam broadening for EELS profiling and EFTEM  imaging, meaning the   beam broadening in TEM specimens do not affect the spatial resolution of EELS profiling and EFTEM imaging too much. 
                
             Figure 3985a. Schematic illustration of the broadening of electron beam  
               within a thin specimen  and of generations of EDS, EELS and AES signals.  
             The spatial resolution for  both the EDS and EELS analyses is improved with the accelerating voltages,  since the incident electron beam spread decreases with an increase in the  accelerating voltage. 
               The spatial resolution of  the inelastic images in TEMs (e.g. EFTEM images and EELS analysis) can be expressed by the following equation, 
                        ---------- [3985] 
             where, 
           R -- An inelastic scattering delocalization factor; 
           ΔEslit -- The energy slit width; 
           E0 -- Eenergy of incident electron beam. 
             The second term in Equation 3985 is related to a beam broadening factor due to chromatic aberration (Cc) of the objective lens because of the finite width of the energy-selecting  slit. The last term is related to spherical aberration (Cs) of the objective  lens. 
             Figure 3985b shows the theoretical  plots of the spatial resolution of the energy-filtered images as a function of  the loss energy for a 300 kV TEM [1]. In the modeling, the energy slit width used was  20 eV, the characteristic scattering angle was considered to be 0.1 rad (~5.7°), and the spherical and chromatic aberrations  are 0.6 and 1.5 mm, respectively. In conclusion, the figure indicates the spatial  resolution is dominated by the inelastic delocalization factor (R) at the  energy losses lower than ~100 eV, while at an energy losses higher than ~100  eV, the spatial resolution is mainly affected by both the chromatic broadening (Dcc)  and the spherical broadening (Dcs). 
               
             Figure 3985b. Theoretical plots of the spatial  resolution of energy-filtered 
               images as a function of energy loss. [1]  
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             [1] Yoshio Bando, Masanori Mitome, Dmitri Golberg, Yoshizo Kitami, Keiji Kurashima, Toshihiko Kaneyama, Yoshihiro Okura and Mikio Naruse, New 300 kV Energy-Filtering Field Emission Electron Microscope, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 40 (2001) pp. L1193 – L1196.  
                |