Chapter/Index: Introduction | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Appendix
The critical sample thickness beyond which the absorption effect becomes significant decreases. If the analyzed film is “infinitely” thin, the effects of X-ray absorption and fluorescence are negligible, and the generated X-ray intensity and the X-ray intensity leaving the film are identical. This assumption is known as the thin film criterion (also called thin-film approximation). In thin foil specimens, the double-scattering processes of electrons are negligible as well. This thin film approximation simplifies the analysis of measured EDS data, as the ratio of X-ray peak intensities from the elements A and B, IA/IB, is simply proportional to the corresponding weight-fraction ratio and thus Cliff-Lorime sensitivity factors (kAB) can be applied. Note kAB is a constant for a given accelerating voltage and the efficiency of a specific EDS spectrometer at the relevant x-ray energies, and is independent of specimen thickness and composition. Table 4642 lists examples of thicknesses at which the thin-film approximation is no longer valid due to X-ray absorption effects in specific materials.
However, X-rays cannot be deflected into an appropriate detector so that their collection is always inefficient (usually < 1%) and thus signal intensity can be a problem from a thin specimen. If the incoming X-rays are very energetic, they may not be totally absorbed before they are detected by the EDS detector. The critical thickness is also wavelength dependent, being much smaller for soft X-rays than for hard X-rays. This is one of the contributing factors for the unreliability of oxygen stoichiometry determination. In summary, in EDS measurements, the intensities of the X-ray peaks from various elements are determined by the factors below:
[1] D. B. Williams: Practical Analytical Electron Microscopy in Materials Science (Philips Electron Optics Publishing Group, Mahwah, NJ 1984).
|