This book (Practical Electron Microscopy and Database) is a reference for TEM and SEM students, operators, engineers, technicians, managers, and researchers.
|
=================================================================================
Bias correction (sometimes called bias subtraction) removes both the detector background and the
spectrometer background.
Firstly, regarding the detector background, the diode capacitors in photo-diode array (PDA) detectors lose charge not only through irradiation but also as a result
of their thermal leakage current, which is slightly different for each element of the
array. In order to obtain values which are proportional to spectral intensity,
a leakage or bias spectrum must be subtracted. This bias spectrum is recorded
while electrons are excluded from the array (e.g., TEM screen lowered to block the electron beam) and will
remain the same provided the integration time and array temperature do not vary.
To minimize the noise content of recorded data and allow longer integration times
(without total discharge by thermal leakage), the photodiode array is cooled to −20 °C
by a thermoelectric device.
Secondly, the
spectrometer background originates mainly from backscattering of the zero-loss beam
from a beam-trap aperture located in front of the detector as shown in Figure 4879 below. This background
is most noticeable at high energy loss (> 1 kV) and with very thin specimens. To
correct this error, this background can be recorded with no specimen in
the beam [1 - 3].

Figure 4879. Top image: example of Gatan spectrometers; Bottom image: schematic of spectrometer. The components labelled
Q1–Q4 are quadrupole electron lenses.
[1] R. F. Egerton, Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope, second edition (Plenum Press, New York, 1996).
[2] P. Crozier and R. F. Egerton, “Mass-thickness determination by Bethe-sumrule normalization of the electron energy loss spectrum,” Ultramicroscopy 27, 9 (1989).
[3] A. J. Craven and T. W. Buggy, “Correcting electron energy loss spectra for artefacts introduced by a serial collection system,” J. Micros. 136, 227 (1984).
[4] R. F. Egerton, Y.-Y. Yang, and S. C. Cheng, “Characterization and use of the Gatan 666 parallel-recording electron energy loss spectrometer”. Ultramicroscopy 48, 239 (1993). |