Practical Electron Microscopy and Database

An Online Book, Second Edition by Dr. Yougui Liao (2006)

Practical Electron Microscopy and Database - An Online Book

Chapter/Index: Introduction | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | Appendix

ExSolve Wafer TEM Prep DualBeam

The advantages and disadvantages of ExSolve Wafer TEM Prep DualBeam for sample preparation and imaging are:

  • Advantages
    • Automation of TEM Preparation: The use of script-based operations and computer vision for wafer pattern recognition allows for automated processes in TEM preparation and imaging, improving efficiency.
    • Higher Throughput and Productivity: When integrated with manually assisted defect registration, the automated FIB setup increases throughput and productivity, showing significant gains in inline defect characterization processes.
  • Disadvantages
    • Challenges with Defect Location Variability: Due to the random distribution of defects on wafers, the automation process struggles to precisely target defect locations, making precise TEM lamella creation challenging.
    • High Cost of Automation Scripts for Varying Defect Locations: Developing automation scripts that can adapt to varying defect locations on a wafer is expensive and labor-intensive, potentially diminishing cost-effectiveness.
    • Prone to Human Error: The reliance on conventional pattern recognition in varying defect scenarios can introduce human error, especially in the setup and calibration stages.
    • Limited to Visible Defects: The current automated approach primarily works for visible defects, reducing its applicability to defects that are not easily detectable visually.
    • Occasional Need for Human Intervention: Despite automation, the process occasionally requires manual intervention, indicating that full automation is yet to be achieved and there’s room for further refinement.

In fiducial markers are used for on-the-fly drift correction during the focused ion beam (FIB) imaging process. These markers help maintain alignment by allowing the system to correct any drift in the ion beam during serial sectioning. Specifically, the top fiducial marker is used for drift correction in FIB images, while other fiducial markers are used for post-milling alignment of scanning electron microscope (SEM) images to ensure accurate 3D reconstruction without distortion​.

In automated TEM lamella preparation for FIB-SEM tomography, fiducial markers play a crucial role in ensuring precise alignment and tracking of the region of interest (ROI) throughout milling and imaging operations. The top fiducial marker is used for on-the-fly drift correction in FIB images, helping to maintain alignment by allowing the system to correct any drift in the ion beam during serial sectioning. Additional fiducial markers, such as cross and circular markers, assist in post-milling alignment of SEM images, supporting accurate 3D reconstruction without distortion. This setup ensures that the correct region is analyzed consistently, allowing for high-fidelity imaging across multiple milling and imaging steps, as shown in Figure 0016a, where an SEM image displays the top view of the ROI.

SEM image displaying the top view of the ROI (Region of Interest). The top fiducial marker is utilized for real-time drift correction in FIB images, while the bottom cross and circular markers are used to align SEM images externally from the dual FIB/SEM system SEM image displaying the top view of the ROI (Region of Interest). The top fiducial marker is utilized for real-time drift correction in FIB images, while the bottom cross and circular markers are used to align SEM images externally from the dual FIB/SEM system
(a)
(b)
Figure 0016a. (a) SEM image displaying the top view of the ROI (Region of Interest). The top fiducial marker is utilized for real-time drift correction in FIB images, while the bottom cross and circular markers are used to align SEM images externally from the dual FIB/SEM system. [1] And, (b) SEM micrographs of the FIB-SEM tomography setup: the left micrograph displays the initial setup within the PyC layer, while the right micrograph illustrates the progression of analysis into the SiC layers. [2]

As shown in Figure 0016b, the automated ex situ lift-out process for FIB TEM sample preparation involves a series of organized steps designed to isolate and prepare a sample for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. The procedure begins with driving the FIB stage to the target coordinate. Then, a protective layer (typically platinum or carbon) is deposited over the area of interest to prevent damage from ion milling. Fiducial markers are then created around the region for precise alignment, followed by capturing an SEM image to verify positioning. Next, initial trench milling is performed to isolate the target sample. A bottom cut then fully detaches the sample. After those milling steps, a coordinate offset is determined and applied to refine the sample's position. The sample then undergoes final thinning and polishing steps to achieve the electron transparency required for TEM imaging. Then, a bridge cut releases the sample for transfer. This automated, structured process ensures high-quality sample preparation with minimal manual intervention, enabling accurate and efficient TEM analysis. Finally, the sample is transferred for ex situ lift-out. The entire preceding procedure before ex situ lift-out can be executed using automated scripts or predefined recipes.

Automation script diagram

Figure 0016b. Automation script diagram.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] Mangipudi, K. R., Radisch, V., Holzer, L., & Volkert, C. A., A FIB-nanotomography method for accurate 3D reconstruction of open nanoporous structures. Ultramicroscopy, 163, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.01.004, 2016.
[2] Arregui-Mena, J. D., Seibert, R. L., & Gerczak, T. J., Characterization of PyC/SiC Interfaces with FIB-SEM Tomography. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 545, 152736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152736, 2021.